Ian McEwan seems to be sitting in a sort of literary throne, lording over contemporary British letters - at least by the fawning reviews coming from the critics. Following the intricacies and inventiveness of "Atonement", McEwan produced the inescusable "Saturday", and now comes this slender volume.
We meet Edward and Florence on their wedding night, in a hotel by Chesil Beach in 1962 - the date is never spelled out, only references made to Kennedy, McMillan and his "night of the long knives":
They were young, educated, and both virgins on this, their wedding night, and they lived in a time when a conversation about sexual difficulties was plainly impossible. But it is never easy.
Indeed it isn't. Edward is the classic McEwan innocent, caught up by the world and people around him. Somehow living a chaste, academic life (punctuated by the occasional bar brawl), Edward has bypassed the early 60s zeitgeist, and enters his nupcial chambers as a Victorian gentleman, literally ready to burst.
Florence comes from a well-off family - her father a successful businessman, her mother a detached academic - and yet the family embraces the penniless Edward, supporting the wedding and their daughter's choice.
The crux of the novel is Florence's incapacity for sexual enjoyment, her disgust of human (male) anatomy and aversion to intimacy. Knowing full well the implications of their wedding night, Florence begins the novel in terror of what's to come next. In studied flashbacks, we learn about the beginnings of their courtship, their families and expectations for the new life together about to begin.
The night unfolds from there. McEwan is a serious writer, has an eye for the minute detail in relationships and creates a believable atmosphere of longing and sexual temptation. Most of this brief novel unfolds satisfactorily, until the underwhelming epilogue.
Without giving away the resolution of their first night, there's seems a disconnect between what we just read and the conclusions the narrator and Edward seem to take from the incident years later. McEwan plays again with the timescale, but while in "Atonement" the reminiscence was the very point of the story, this time the shift seems like an afterthought, neither coherent nor true.